MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23-01-20, 04:34
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Thanks for the manual source, Adrian.

And thanks for the story behind the pressure switches, Marco. Very interesting. I'll make sure the switches are hooked up to warning lights for the driver.

I'm also going to install two of those cheap eBay tachometers that sense the HT signal from a plug wire on each engine, as it seems ridiculous to me the driver had no way of monitoring the throttle synchronization of the individual engines, or the synchronization of the shifts between the two Hydramatics. It was seeing the huge shifting rpm discrepancies on the installed tachs on the Chaffee that tipped us off that at least one of the trannies was bad.

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-20, 23:19
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,610
Default

I am working on an M5A1 Stuart tank, which has the two hydramatics coupled with the Cadillac flatheads. There is a two terminal switch on the top of each of the transmissions (two wires running to each) which I cannot find on the wiring schematic in the TM from June of 43. Any ideas on those? One is hooked up, and the other side has bare wires and is hanging on the bellyplate. You need to be a 3 foot high contortionist to do anything to this tank.

I'm gong to get a light and a mirror up into there, but am hoping someone can save me some time and a hairdo full of leaking dexron.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-02-20, 02:25
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

That'll be the low oil pressure switches for the warning lights on the dash.
The Hydramatics in the Chaffee and the Staghound have the same switches.

On the Staghound, the lights just warn that the engine has stalled as described above. On the Chaffee the switches are also tied into the starter circuit to prevent cranking an engine that is already running.

The switch set point is 60psi, since the trannies are supposed to generate at least 60 psi at hot idle. In reality, one of our Chaffee transmissions only puts out about 55 psi (although it rises above 60 psi as soon as rpm is raised, so it can come at idle with engine running.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-20, 05:48
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,610
Default

Thanks for the reply Malcolm. I wonder if they are inline with each engine's low oil pressure switch? I'll pull the multimeter out tomorrow and do some testing before I finish installing the belly plate.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-02-20, 18:45
marco marco is offline
Marco Hogenkamp
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Lichtenvoorde, Holland
Posts: 267
Default Stuart transmission low oil pressure warning lights

This is what I could find in the M5A1 manual TM9-727C from December 22, 1942.
It seems that these are just warning lights, so not wired in the cranking motor circuit.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_9668.jpg (574.0 KB, 1 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_9669.jpg (507.4 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_9671.jpg (295.6 KB, 2 views)
__________________
Staghound F215633, 12th Troop "Sergeants Car" XII Manitoba Dragoons
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-02-20, 22:19
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,610
Default

Thanks for that Marco. This tank is a little bit later, so there are some changes, but I think your wiring is valid. I still have some sorting out to do on the wiring, but I think it is under control. The switch in question turns out to be bent from the re-installation of the engine/transmission some years back. All of the lightbulbs for the three warning lamps I also found to be laying in a bin near to the control panel. I can barely reach the left hand switch, never mind testing or replacing it. I think I can pull a panel underneath the turret basket to access the tops of the trannies.....that will be Monday's job.

How come, for every job I want to do on this thing, three other jobs show up? Where does it all end?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-02-20, 18:01
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,610
Default

As I said in my last post, every job ends up with 3 more. It turns out that one of the switches was only loosely in the transmission while the other switch (the bent one) was in so tight I had to modify tools to get it out. It turns out neither switch was appropriate... the right one was a 60psi normally open, so the light would have come on at 60. The other one was 4 psi normally open, so the light would have come on at 4 psi. Both switches were two terminal, so required a new wire running from ground to one post of the switch. Both sides merely had the ground wire end taped to the wiring conduit, which is by no means a suitable or dependable ground.

Going by the Honeywell chart for Hobbs switches, a suitable switch would be a Hobbs 78154 (60 psi) which is a single terminal normally closed. An alternate will be Hobbs 76064 (60 psi) normally closed 2 terminal, which would require a ground wire to be provided. In the case of your lower pressure transmission Malcolm, these switches can be adjusted, so you could lower the pressure to 54 and get rid of the annoying warning light as well as prevent accidental application of the starter. Here is a link to the Hobbs chart on the switches: https://sensing.honeywell.com/index.php?ci_id=49633 Watch out as there are variations to the pressures within each part number given, which will be reflected in two extra digits after the part number. They are easy enough to adjust however by removing the little rubber plug at the top and turning the screw in or out as required.

I noticed that the two transmissions in the tank are slightly different. One has only 1 port in between the two adjustment screws on top, while the other has that port as well as another forward of the adjustment screws. I'll have to investigate if the pressures are the same in both ports, or if I should be using the same port location on both transmissions. Currently the last people used the one center port and one forward port.

I tried doing some of this work from underneath, but it is near impossible. So I am now laying in the turret basket, having removed the appropriate ammunition bin and floor plates. There is no comfortable way for a 240 pound man to be laying in the bottom of the turret basket.

Last edited by rob love; 13-02-20 at 00:13.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Staghound Question Richard Coutts-Smith The Armour Forum 9 06-05-18 15:29
M24 Chaffee Hydramatic Transmission - components and operation of the valve body Malcolm Towrie The Armour Forum 0 18-03-17 00:33
M24 Chaffee - setting rear servo on Hydramatic transmission Malcolm Towrie The Armour Forum 3 14-03-17 05:02
Another Staghound question Steve Guthrie The Armour Forum 22 28-06-06 03:56
transmission question alleramilitaria The Carrier Forum 2 25-02-05 10:18


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016