MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21-05-21, 00:07
Perry Kitson Perry Kitson is offline
metal urgest
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 464
Default

The old timers always said, "the only thing keeping the oil in was the paint".
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21-05-21, 02:32
Jesse Browning Jesse Browning is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 366
Default

Are there match marks on the parts? Supposed to be, but my clutch didnt have any either.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-05-21, 03:31
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Browning View Post
Are there match marks on the parts? Supposed to be, but my clutch didnt have any either.
You mean match marks to identify which parts come from which engine? Didn’t know that so I haven’t been looking for them.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-05-21, 13:16
Jesse Browning Jesse Browning is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 366
Default

The match marks are usually for keeping everything balanced, but if marked differently could give a clue to origin.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-05-21, 13:17
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default

Malcolm, so based on what you have said, then the purpose of the shims might be to prevent over bending the spring and risking breakage ( as well as the travel)
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-06-21, 07:28
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

I have to confess, guys, since we removed a total of 0.020” total from both the flywheel and pressure plates to clean up the heat checking, I decided to install both clutches with just the one 0.032” shim per bolt. My justification is that my experience working on GM engines and transmissions is that the design engineers were way too anal about setting allowable specs and wear tolerances. I defy anyone to notice any difference between a 6-71 running with spec 0.016” valve clearance (4 valve head) and say 0.018” clearance.
Also the GM spec of 1.460” for the injector timing, with no tolerance specified, has at least one guy on YouTube making the effort to get it that exact spec, I seriously doubt if +/-0.010” makes an detectable difference.
If we find out I’m wrong on the shims when we get the engines back in the Sherman, I will of course not be posting it here.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-21, 05:45
Malcolm Towrie Malcolm Towrie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Whitby, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 306
Default

The clutch release bearings have been installed. And also the transfer case inner housing with the release forks, and the outer housing.
Much to my relief, there was some free play on both clutch release forks, indicating that the setup with just one 1/32” shim under each clutch cover bolt was allowing the release bearings to unload.
The sketch in post #1 above above shows that if bolting up the transfer case had left no free play on the clutch forks, we would have had to pull the t/c off and add more shims to move the diaphragm spring inner bore towards the flywheel.
Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-21, 07:08
Michael R. Michael R. is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,164
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malcolm Towrie View Post
I have to confess, guys, since we removed a total of 0.020” total from both the flywheel and pressure plates to clean up the heat checking, I decided to install both clutches with just the one 0.032” shim per bolt. . . .

If we find out I’m wrong on the shims when we get the engines back in the Sherman, I will of course not be posting it here.
Malcolm
Good effort Malcolm. Nice to see you catch a break.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M4A2 Sherman Mike Gray The Armour Forum 31 09-02-16 21:11
Wanted: Sherman M4A2 rad fans Frank v R For Sale Or Wanted 2 11-05-14 01:26
Sold: 1945 M4A2 76mm Wet Sherman 45jim For Sale Or Wanted 9 29-06-12 02:41
Painting question regardinga Sherman M4A2 tank Royal Canadian Ordance Corps The Restoration Forum 8 22-05-10 15:11
M4A2 Sherman III kevinT The Armour Forum 39 17-05-08 10:24


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 14:31.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016