MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-22, 12:14
Alex van de Wetering Alex van de Wetering is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,767
Default

Quote:
Were these fitted to early CMPs? Pre-dated the shorter steel versions?
John, as far as I know Cab 11's were never factory fitted with the condensor can, but you do see them on most, not all, Cab 12's delivered from the factory. So, I am guessing they were introduced somewhere in 1941. These are all the "normal" smaller size cans though.

Could your can be from an MCP truck maybe?....or something armoured.....Fox, Otter???
__________________
Chevrolet C8 cab 11 FFW
BSA Folding Bicycle
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-22, 14:15
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Based only on the stamped part number, I would not assume this to be a CMP part. The prefix "C" isn't isn't typical of either Ford (usually more than one letter and not normally C without another letter) or Chevrolet (normally no letters) in the period. Just looking at Chevrolet part numbers, they appear to have been assigned more or less sequentially in the order that the part was developed and by 1930 Chevrolet was already past 124238 in numbers so I doubt this would be a Chevrolet designed part developed for CMP use. I also don't see 124283 in any of the CMP parts books I checked.
Having said this, it is an opinion - not a guaranteed fact. I could be completely out to lunch on this and have missed somthing obvious.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-22, 17:35
rob love rob love is offline
carrier mech
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Shilo MB, the armpit of Canada
Posts: 7,594
Default

I see 6 digit numbers prefixed like that all the time for early the US military items, prior to them adopting the FSN, and later developing that into the NSN. Perhaps it is a US military number.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-22, 18:59
Jordan Baker's Avatar
Jordan Baker Jordan Baker is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,167
Default

Otters mid way through production were fitted with the standard CMP can. Early Otters didn’t but a modification kit was released to fit the cans in them.
__________________
Jordan Baker
RHLI Museum,
Otter LRC
C15A-Wire3, 1944
Willys MB, 1942
10cwt Canadian trailer
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-22, 21:54
David Herbert David Herbert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland - previously Suffolk
Posts: 563
Default

I agree with Rob, I think that is an American part number. The 'C' refers to the size of the drawing of the part, 'A' being the biggest. It does not indicate a manufacturer or a revision.

David
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-22, 23:38
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

Thanks to Rob and David - I went and dug out some of the stash of blueprints I received from Alex Blair's collection to look at their numbering. One drawing in particular caught my eye...
Drawing number C-321587 originally issued on paper marked as the Army Engineering Design Branch, crossed out and stamped as the Directorate Of Vehicle Development, Q.M. G. Branch, Dept. of National Defence has a reference to GM part 5820086 and depicts a "Flange-Transmission-Drive-Shaft". This drawing is dated 5-2-47.
Definite proof that the format of "C-######" was used to number drawings within the AEDB and QMG Branch, including automotive parts.

A very quick check in several CMP and GM armoured vehicle manuals didn't find 5820086. Hopefully someone else will have better luck finding the application of GM part 5820086...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-10-22, 07:08
Maurice Donckers Maurice Donckers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beek Holland
Posts: 418
Default

to me it looks like a T 16 Carrier condenser can , maybe somebody can check a T16 out.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Coolant recovery bottle on dash? Phil Waterman The Restoration Forum 0 31-07-17 21:38
Coolant Recover Tank Not Working Phil Waterman The Restoration Forum 3 28-05-15 01:58
12 volt condensor Little Jo The Restoration Forum 23 25-06-12 09:44
Chevy Condensor Can wanted Neil Ashley The Restoration Forum 5 28-04-05 21:24
Coolant Heater JD Baillie Post-war Military Vehicles 10 23-12-03 17:30


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016