MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 31-05-05, 20:36
Jacek Jacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 27
Default

"I think is is a fact that the Red Army lost several battles in the opening phase of "Barbarossa" because it was deployed for attack and not for defence."
Says Stellan.
I cannot disagree. Why was RKKA deployed for attack in 1941. Attack whom? Its partner Germany?

Many a scholar laughs at Viktor Suvorov. But, as yet, I havenīt seen a serious attempt at repudiation of his main point:
"Stalin was readying for attacking Germany in summer 1941".
The said scholars often find a minor mistake here or there, and in this way try to discard Suvorov and his books.

I think itīs a mistake. I think the man is right and history needs rewriting on this point. If RKKA was able to reach Berlin using 15% of Soviet prewar industrial potential, it was surely able to do so with 100% in 1941.

Why is Suvorov wrong? Is he?
__________________
a Polish boychik
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:11.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016