MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > 'B' ECHELON > The Sergeants' Mess

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old 18-01-06, 13:43
Stewart Loy Stewart Loy is offline
T-16, C15A
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Out in the woods near Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 884
Default Re: Privately owned armored military combat vehicles unfit for licensing in Kansas.

Quote:
Originally posted by Al Nickolson


Whereas privately owned surplus armored military combat vehicles are a cause of concern for law enforcement and homeland security.

Al,

Thanks for the update - as you well know, what they do down there, eventually drifts up here!

I was particularly disappointed in the use of the 'homeland security' bullcrap. You can tell they are on thin ice when they trot out a sort of rights and freedom crushing 'law' like that for anything from illegal wiretaps, racial profilling, and the obviously unsavoury HMV owners - wankers!

That being said - why the fake interest in 'safety'? Old military vehicles have no fewer seat belts or air bags that Granpops old Model A - but are those antiques banned? I know that I would feel much safer inside a Ferret than the old Ford!

Please keep us posted on what the MVPA gang is doing about this disturbing issue. These attempts at social re-engineering make we worry ...

Thanks.


Stewart
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016