MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Armour Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-07, 04:51
Mark W. Tonner's Avatar
Mark W. Tonner Mark W. Tonner is offline
Senior Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: London, Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 3,027
Wink Re: Probably 90 Fd Regt

Quote:
Originally posted by Tony Viste
Kevin,

Since all the references to "95 Fd Regt" are made on one day (20 Mar 45), I'm going to assume the clerk made a mistake and meant 90 Fd Regt RA, the SP Fd Regt of 50 Inf Div. I will update the Sexton pages soon.
Hi Tony;

... you beat me to it, I was going to post this in answer to Kevin's question:

Hi Kevin;

I think that the '95 Fd Regt RA' listed as the receiving unit on 20 Mar 45, should actually read '90 Fd Regt, RA' (90th (City of London) Field Regiment RA(TA)) who replaced 150 Fd Regt, RA (150th (South Notts Hussars Yeomanry) Field Regiment RA(TA)) within the 4th AGRA (British I Corps) approx. Jan 1945.

For the 9 equipments in question (census numbers listed below), the entries are all more or less the same:

Date: 19 Feb 45, Issued to: 259 Corps Del Sqn (1 Corps) From: 17 Veh Coy
Date: 20 Mar 45, Issued to: 95 Fd Regt RA; From: 259 Corps Del Sqn (1 Corps)

with all 9 equipments being issued to the regiment on 20 Mar 45, probably as replacements for vehicle casualties of one form or another suffered by the regiment.

NOTE: 259 Corps Del Sqn was the British I Corps delivery squadron

S233735
S233783
S233830
S233901
S234014
S234045
S234152
S234494
S234818

Hope this helps.

Cheers
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016