![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
......."much to the chagrin to the peaceniks and pinkos who run (down) city hall, ....."
Tazer 'em,the devil take 'em and send them to 'Gitmo....!! Rob... Were you not out there laying on a taste of military hickory,,,???? and your next assignment is to square off those %#*^$(@&*&*%$* fiends that are ramming our fisher friends that are battling those murderous seals that are killing our cod...man ..woman and little Tommy cod.. Watch this and learn the truth.. http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=G8sz-cT0btQ
__________________
Alex Blair :remember :support :drunk: |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Get yer carcass out to the barn for some refresher training.
__________________
RHC Why is it that when you have the $$, you don't have the time, and when you have the time you don't have the $$? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I took a Vancouver Sun editor to task years ago for their continuing usage of this very gender specific term. His response? He couldn't come up with another term for Gunman! I resisted the urge to challenge his credentials to be the editor of a large city newspaper and came up with several alternatives: criminal, perpetrator, bad actor, for example. Of course, my suggestions were ignored and they continue to use Gunman to this day. Rant over, Derek.
__________________
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Rant continues - different vein: It's all liberal generated dross designed to change the face of their Canada. Let's tale "Non-custodial fathers" as an example of this tripe. These are the men who are totally responsible for their children (so said every family court I've been forced to endure), but are not permitted to exercise that responsibility - except thru the wallet. It is not surprising that most editors in Canada can't generate enough brain power to see through the smokescreen of liberalism - most papers in our nation are controlled by liberal friendly interests....what the hell has this to do with trucks? Nothing, but it felt good to rant...
__________________
RHC Why is it that when you have the $$, you don't have the time, and when you have the time you don't have the $$? Last edited by RHClarke; 11-05-08 at 03:28. |
![]() |
|
|