MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > GENERAL WW2 TOPICS > WW2 Military History & Equipment

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 11-11-24, 14:02
David Dunlop David Dunlop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Posts: 3,602
Default

IIRC, the tracks on the Buffalo were somewhat narrow. I suspect if the mud was softer than anticipated, the tracks may have dug into the mud enough the hulls simply bottomed out and the Buffalo would be going nowhere until either enough tide came back in to refloat it, or a LAD could retrieve it.

Either way, pretty uncomfortable for the troops.

Is there any mention in the records about sufficient air cover being provided for the landings?


David
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LAV3 Monument program Hans Mulder Post-war Military Vehicles 39 24-11-18 14:49
Ferret Monument Moose Jaw Robin Craig Post-war Military Vehicles 14 19-02-17 02:43
CFB Borden Ferret Monument Robin Craig Post-war Military Vehicles 12 05-08-15 04:56
Wanted: UC for Monument Frank v R For Sale Or Wanted 11 22-06-14 02:30
New M109 Monument CFB Kingston Robin Craig Post-war Military Vehicles 5 02-11-13 17:12


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:15.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016