MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 26-08-15, 23:38
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

If you have somebody local who has a C60X, you will be able to study how General Motors did the design work to put a 270 CI GMC motor into a CMP frame. They did have to use different rear motor mounts, different mounts for the radiator and extend the grille about one inch. There were probably many other small changes as well.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-08-15, 00:05
Alex van de Wetering Alex van de Wetering is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,767
Default

The bare block of a 270 is about 72cm long, while the 216 sits at about 68,4cm., so little over an inch longer, which resulted in the 1inch grill spacer on the C60X as Grant mentioned.

But, maybe a 235? 235's do pop op on the Dutch markplaats website. You probably need to change a few things to make it work on right hand drive(?).

Or maybe a Bedford engine? they seem to be quite similar in design.

Alex
__________________
Chevrolet C8 cab 11 FFW
BSA Folding Bicycle
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-08-15, 00:34
Grant Bowker Grant Bowker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,321
Default

The early 235 is a simple replacement, nothing to change.
The later (about 1953 onward) 235 and 261 Chevrolet engines are the same physical size as the 216, fit very well, but usually need an adapter plate and an earlier water pump to make the fan placement correct relative to the radiator. These are simple bolt on changes. The CMP flywheel housing and clutch bolt to the rear of the engine without problem. Some late engines do not use the front mount like the 216 but use 2 side front mounts. This can be changed without great difficulty although you may have to remove the front timing cover and parts to get to the front mounting plate (the plate is the same shape but may not have the holes in place for the front mount as used on the 216).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-08-15, 08:38
Maurice Donckers Maurice Donckers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beek Holland
Posts: 418
Default

It is not so difficult to find a WW2 block , but they are usualy ready for a rebuild . I can point you in a direction to find one , also valves, Guides ,con rods with casted in bearings are plenyfull available , even Cam shafts and Crankshafts are available , write me a mail and I can help.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-08-15, 13:47
Markwin Serlui Markwin Serlui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 101
Default

Just did Maurice
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-15, 15:02
Markwin Serlui Markwin Serlui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 101
Default

Ik might be able to get a chevy 216 engine or a 235.
Would that be any good?
Both need reconditioning...

Last edited by Markwin Serlui; 02-09-15 at 15:09.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-15, 20:15
Bob Carriere Bob Carriere is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hammond, Ontario
Posts: 5,259
Default Your choice.....

For purist accurate restoration go for the 216....

For ease of rebuilding. more power and fun of driving go for the 235.

Cheers
__________________
Bob Carriere....B.T.B
C15a Cab 11
Hammond, Ontario
Canada
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Track pin replacement ShawnC The Carrier Forum 3 19-08-15 10:10
CMP mirror replacement Svenn Ryen The Restoration Forum 18 29-05-13 19:13
Handbrake replacement Little Jo The Softskin Forum 26 08-04-11 11:23
Pin Replacement LYLE CUNDALL The Carrier Forum 3 27-08-05 20:43
Recommended Replacement? Brad Mills The Restoration Forum 1 30-05-05 15:19


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 12:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016