MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Restoration Forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27-08-15, 09:38
Maurice Donckers Maurice Donckers is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beek Holland
Posts: 418
Default

It is not so difficult to find a WW2 block , but they are usualy ready for a rebuild . I can point you in a direction to find one , also valves, Guides ,con rods with casted in bearings are plenyfull available , even Cam shafts and Crankshafts are available , write me a mail and I can help.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-08-15, 14:47
Markwin Serlui Markwin Serlui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 101
Default

Just did Maurice
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-15, 16:02
Markwin Serlui Markwin Serlui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 101
Default

Ik might be able to get a chevy 216 engine or a 235.
Would that be any good?
Both need reconditioning...

Last edited by Markwin Serlui; 02-09-15 at 16:09.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-15, 21:15
Bob Carriere Bob Carriere is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hammond, Ontario
Posts: 5,259
Default Your choice.....

For purist accurate restoration go for the 216....

For ease of rebuilding. more power and fun of driving go for the 235.

Cheers
__________________
Bob Carriere....B.T.B
C15a Cab 11
Hammond, Ontario
Canada
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-15, 23:31
motto (RIP) motto (RIP) is offline
RIP
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Woodend,Victoria,Australia
Posts: 1,068
Default Which 235?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Carriere View Post
For purist accurate restoration go for the 216....

For ease of rebuilding. more power and fun of driving go for the 235.
Which 235 are you referring to Bob? There would be little difference between rebuilding a 216 and a first series (WW2) 235 as many parts interchange and construction is identical.

David
__________________
Hell no! I'm not that old!

Last edited by Hanno Spoelstra; 02-09-15 at 23:48. Reason: formatting
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-09-15, 23:35
Phil Waterman Phil Waterman is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Temple, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 3,929
Default Definitely the later

Quote:
Originally Posted by motto View Post
Which 235 are you referring to Bob? There would be little difference between rebuilding a 216 and a first series (WW2) 235 as many parts interchange and construction is identical.
Hi Dave

Good point, people definitely want to look for the later 235 with better lubrication system.

But if all you can find is the early 235 and the price is right it is better than nothing, by a long shot.

Cheers Phil
__________________
Phil Waterman
`41 C60L Pattern 12
`42 C60S Radio Pattern 13
`45 HUP
http://canadianmilitarypattern.com/
New e-mail Philip@canadianmilitarypattern.com

Last edited by Hanno Spoelstra; 02-09-15 at 23:49. Reason: formatting
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-09-15, 00:05
Markwin Serlui Markwin Serlui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Holland
Posts: 101
Default

Hi,

Thanks for the input!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Track pin replacement ShawnC The Carrier Forum 3 19-08-15 11:10
CMP mirror replacement Svenn Ryen The Restoration Forum 18 29-05-13 20:13
Handbrake replacement Little Jo The Softskin Forum 26 08-04-11 12:23
Pin Replacement LYLE CUNDALL The Carrier Forum 3 27-08-05 21:43
Recommended Replacement? Brad Mills The Restoration Forum 1 30-05-05 16:19


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:55.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016