|
|
|
|
#1
30-07-08, 19:42
|
||||
|
||||
Nice list. However two of the numbers are not CT#'s They should be T#'s Not really sure if it makes much difference but that is what is stamped on them.
UC 2MkI 213 Mar 42 CT 51101 UC 2MkI 213 Apr 42 CT 51176 Both of these are only T#'s
__________________
Jordan Baker RHLI Museum, Otter LRC C15A-Wire3, 1944 Willys MB, 1942 10cwt Canadian trailer 
|
|
#2
31-07-08, 01:22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hey Jordon
Sometimes this hobby gives me a headache!!!  It was my understanding that all canadian carriers were CT XXXX and that in the beginning of production not all were actually hull marked CT and some were only marked with a T number. But that they would still have been a "CT" My list does have a bias in that I have tried to only post canadian carriers. Hence the CT designations. IF not ALL Canadian carriers were marked CT as they left the factory, was there a rhyme or reason for the variance? I thought T designations were normally British and Australian carriers. Jordon could you confirm if the 2 carriers you mention were canadian? If anyone can shed some light.... (Type slowly please!) 
__________________
Ralph Volkert UC 2Mk I* Upper Hull: CB 8075 Lower Hull: 8105 S/N: 9075 Date: Jun(est) 42 contract #: CDLV 213 1946 Willys Jeep 1974 Plymouth Road Runner 1987 Trans Am
|
|
#3
31-07-08, 01:34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes both of those numbers are Canadian built carriers. One of them is mine and the other is about 15min away from me. It is a Cnd built carrier. However they both have only a "T" followed by the number stamped into them. It is my understanding that they were built under a British contract hense the lack of "C"
__________________
Jordan Baker RHLI Museum, Otter LRC C15A-Wire3, 1944 Willys MB, 1942 10cwt Canadian trailer
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
