|
|
|
|
#1
31-07-08, 00:22
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Jordon
Sometimes this hobby gives me a headache!!!  It was my understanding that all canadian carriers were CT XXXX and that in the beginning of production not all were actually hull marked CT and some were only marked with a T number. But that they would still have been a "CT" My list does have a bias in that I have tried to only post canadian carriers. Hence the CT designations. IF not ALL Canadian carriers were marked CT as they left the factory, was there a rhyme or reason for the variance? I thought T designations were normally British and Australian carriers. Jordon could you confirm if the 2 carriers you mention were canadian? If anyone can shed some light.... (Type slowly please!) 
__________________
Ralph Volkert UC 2Mk I* Upper Hull: CB 8075 Lower Hull: 8105 S/N: 9075 Date: Jun(est) 42 contract #: CDLV 213 1946 Willys Jeep 1974 Plymouth Road Runner 1987 Trans Am 
|
|
#2
31-07-08, 00:34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes both of those numbers are Canadian built carriers. One of them is mine and the other is about 15min away from me. It is a Cnd built carrier. However they both have only a "T" followed by the number stamped into them. It is my understanding that they were built under a British contract hense the lack of "C"
__________________
Jordan Baker RHLI Museum, Otter LRC C15A-Wire3, 1944 Willys MB, 1942 10cwt Canadian trailer
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
