MLU FORUM  

Go Back   MLU FORUM > MILITARY VEHICLES > The Carrier Forum

Notices

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 28-04-12, 14:01
Lynn Eades Lynn Eades is offline
Bluebell
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 5,541
Default Alistair

Page 208 of Vanderveens book(Fighting Vehicle Directory, WWII) uses the same description.(as my previous post)
If you read Nigel Watsons book I, pages 210 and 211. The COIUC 6097 Motors are the 95 H.P. motors (No.3) in the Universal carriers as well as in the Loyd carrier listings.
The 79E 6004 variations being The 65H.P. (No.1) motors.
Yes, I agree there are many mistakes in Wartime publications, which is understandable. However this part is very clear in its direction, and I believe this to be correct.
T.D.14758 is incorrect. It implies all MkI, MkII, and Mk III, Universals are all 85 H.P. which is definately wrong. Read the bit above the Cylinder head info on the same page (212)
What it is saying is that if the 65hp motor is replaced by an 85 hp, the carrier is no longer a No.1, but now a No.2 .
__________________
Bluebell

Carrier Armoured O.P. No1 Mk3 W. T84991
Carrier Bren No2.Mk.I. NewZealand Railways. NZR.6.
Dodge WC55. 37mm Gun Motor Carriage M6
Jeep Mb #135668
So many questions....
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Maple Leaf Up, 2003-2016