|
|
#11
30-11-13, 18:04
|
|||
|
|||
It's always a tricky one. I don't agree with those who leave range damage and say ''it's part of the vehicles history'' when they have restored it to an in service condition, i.e. before it's time as a target.
Similarly, removing real battle damage seems a shame but sometimes it can be too bad to leave unrepaired. I like Hanno's suggestion, not something I'd considered before! 
__________________
Adrian Barrell 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| F60s LAAT Census Number from Chassis Number | Mark Towers | The Softskin Forum | 3 | 08-05-20 16:14 |
| Falaise Gap: Hill 140 drama | Crewman | The Armour Forum | 32 | 03-08-05 08:02 |
| Falaise Gap: Losses and successes of the Canadian 4th Armoured Division | Crewman | The Armour Forum | 26 | 28-05-05 03:01 |
| Falaise Gap: Friendly fire (not from the air) | Crewman | The Armour Forum | 2 | 06-05-05 16:57 |
| Falaise Gap: Air drops for the armoured divisions | Crewman | The Armour Forum | 0 | 27-03-05 18:23 |
Threaded Mode