Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanno Spoelstra
Not having my abacus on hand, I used an online calculator ( http://www.advanced-ev.com/Calculators/TireSize/) to calculate the following:
Both trucks traveling at convoy speed of 25 mph:
F30 with 7.16 diff ratio and 37" diameter (10.50-16) tyre: engine runs at 1626 rpm
F60L/FGT with 7.16 diff ratio and 41" diameter (10.50-20) tyre: engine runs at 1467 rpm
Pretty much the same?
|
Not even close. The 10% difference in revs results in a loss of nearly 20% of the power. My copy of the Ford Service bulletins is missing the Power/torque curve for the 1939-on 239ci 95hp engine (

), but I have attached the pic of the 85hp to demonstrate.
At 1467rpm, the 85hp engine is producing about
38hp and about 151ft.lb of torque. At 1626rpm, those figures jump to
45hp and 155ft.lb.
I have found a chart online for the 95hp which seems to show corresponding figures of
42hp /160ft.lb at 1467rpm and
53hp/164ft.lb at 1626rpm. Clearly the 60cwt will be struggling carrying twice the load.
Using your linked calculator, if the 60cwt is in 3rd gear (1.69:1 x 7.16 = 12.1), at 25mph the engine will be turning 2479rpm. At these revs, the 95hp will be producing
81hp and 161ft.lb., or nearly 60% more power than the 30cwt in 4th gear.
The Ford V8 loves to rev, and that's how the 60cwt will be capable of carrying twice the load at the same road speed as the 30cwt. The Chev engines however, have a reputation of producing more power and torque lower in the rev range, and their comparative power outputs at certain revs WILL be different to the Ford. This trait of the Chev engine will see them shifting up a gear sooner than the Ford V8, which prefers to rev out fully in a gear before shifting up. Interestingly, the Ford 226 Straight6 in the 2GT trucks (has a very similar torque curve to the Chev 216, and would be a more compatible truck in Convoy with the Chev).