![]() |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
A Mk 5 had an ECC of 118105. A Mk 5/2 had an ECC of 118107. A Mk 5/2 with IR alone had an ECC of 118108. I would think the vehicle part (What is the correct term for the non-turret part of a tank?) is from a Mk 5 or Mk 5/2. The only change for the turret not to be a Mk 5/2 with IR and RMG is the 20-pdr barrel, which, as Mike has pointed out, is a quick switch as both it and the L7A1 105-mm barrel were compatible. I'm going to stick my neck out and say it is a Mk 5/2, but with a replacement barrel. I would think that at the time it was thought keeping an L7A1 barrel on a gate guard would be wasteful, as 105-mm guns remained on Canadian tanks even after the Centurion was replaced. Now, how do we Fedex a Type B barrel to Oshawa? Cheers, Dan. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CENTURION Question? | jdmcm | The Armour Forum | 4 | 10-04-17 04:11 |
And the answer to the Centurion question is.....? | Mike Cecil | The Armour Forum | 3 | 28-11-11 22:38 |
Centurion Mk 11 Question | Dan Martel | Post-war Military Vehicles | 5 | 11-09-07 01:44 |
Beldam's Canadian Centurion Gun Tanks book... | Dana Nield | For Sale Or Wanted | 0 | 05-12-03 03:41 |