![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Nevington War Museum lists it as "Commer Q2 Type 105 Radio Van"
nevington-commer-q2-type-105-radio-van7_orig.jpg nevington-commer-q2-type-105-radio-van2_orig.jpg nevington-commer-q2-type-105-radio-van3_orig.jpg nevington-commer-q2-type-105-radio-van5_orig.jpg nevington-commer-q2-type-105-radio-van1_orig.jpg
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Type 105 Radio Vehicle's purpose was a mobile VHF direction finder station:
Ref. https://hmvf.co.uk/topic/7705-light-...comment=106646 Quote:
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
3E23C5A7-056C-4918-9740-18CBD140028A.jpeg
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
RAF Commer and captured Commer.
Photos from my collection.
__________________
Keith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, I have a dilema.
We have removed the body from our Q2 and we are still left wondering about what body would have been fitted. The chassis rails are very short and have a heavy duty fitted wartime towbar arrangement. We have rubbed the chassis down and can confirm it has not been cut down or welded at any position. 51169568136_ffa7de03ba.jpg https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...ffa7de03ba.jpg So, the options.
Any thoughts? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hello Kevin!
Quote:
Quote:
The 30-cwt truck side view above shows the chassis is considerably shorter than the body. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Hanno,
Thanks for replying and giving your thoughts. Mine definitely has the Pintle Hook and its good to see photos of the Tructor towbar that is a lot more substantial. I have compared the photos I have for the GS bodied truck with mine and the chassis is a lot shorter. Agreed, the body has quite an overhang on the GS truck but the rails do extend quite far behind the rear wing. If you look at mine from the side the chassis stops roughly in line with the back edge of the rear wing. It simply doesn't look right, and also the GS body made for mine is considerably shorter than the original but this was made postwar as far as I know so is not original. Thanks, Kevin. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Kevin,
It could be that your chassis was a GS truck which was shortened, or a Pre-heater truck which was rebuilt for another role, including the replacement of the gearbox with PTO. I think the former is more likely than the latter. I have seen other ex-MVs which had their chassis bobbed when they were converted to garage break down trucks, for example.
__________________
Regards, Hanno -------------------------- |
![]() |
|
|