![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another Ferret question: I found the ignition timing of the Ferret I am working on at 25 deg BTDC. It still idled reasonably well. I corrected it to the spec 0 deg BTDC and maybe it idled a bit better.
I can't help feeling 0 deg BTDC is too retarded with modern gas. Retarded timing can cause hot running and it definitely reduces power and increases fuel consumption. Typical static timing seems to be 10-15 deg BTDC on other vehicles, albeit more modern ones. Combustion rate with 60 year old combustion chamber design and a 6.4:1 CR must be a bit sluggish so I suspect the engine would benefit from some more ignition advance. I don't expect us to try hand start the old girl so I don't see that as a significant issue. So I am considering advancing the timing to 10 deg BTDC to see if it makes any noticeable difference. I think the 25 deg added by centrifugal advance to give a total of 35 deg should still be safe, what with modern gas having lots of detonation resistance compared to old-time gas. Has any one tried this? Any comments? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
235 timing? | CWO (ret) Gilles Aubé | The Gun Park | 3 | 18-06-13 00:52 |
M38A1 timing...? | Casey B | Post-war Military Vehicles | 22 | 05-02-12 02:54 |
flathead timing marks. | kevin powles | The Carrier Forum | 2 | 24-09-09 05:16 |
Problems with site timing out | Phil Waterman | TAC HQ | 3 | 24-02-08 22:20 |
235 timing ? | rampant rivet | The Restoration Forum | 5 | 02-11-06 22:17 |