military bridging

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Originally Posted by MicS

The turret number '21' is consistent with 'A' Squadron, and would make this tank part of 2 Troop 'A' Sqn 1 Lothians.

Other markings are not readable but could include the AoS number '52', the tank name and T-number, plus maybe some loading code:

14410266554_73a60edb8d_o.jpg

The name of the tank should be one of these four, since No.20 was RHODERICK DHU T212645, see http://www.gahetna.nl/collectie/afbe...rm/00011000125

Michel,

The link you provided above is dead, but possibly it pointed to the attached picture of Sherman Crab T-212645 RHODERICK DHU after it met its demise at Westkapelle, The Netherlands, during Operation Infatuate II in November 1944.

HTH,
Hanno

af7211829b5d7052d84771d886ea3d3aa16bca93f04f7e68ac560012dac7a40f.jpg
Source: http://proxy.handle.net/10648/ac053d...8-003048976d84

[MicS]

Hanno,

Thank you for the new link . These otherwise excellent photobanks have a tendency to change their interface every so often, and I can't always keep up

I've updated the link in the referred post.

Michel

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Originally Posted by MicS

Thank you for the new link . These otherwise excellent photobanks have a tendency to change their interface every so often, and I can't always keep up

I've updated the link in the referred post.

Michel,

And thank you for your in-depth analysis and documentation!

I have taken the liberty to celan up some of your postings by adding the pictures as attachments, plus links to their sources. That way, the pictures are in a format which fits the screen, and will alway stay within the respective thread, even if the photobank or photo hosting service changes their policy. While the public photobanks may change their interfaces, I am more concerned by the private photo hosting companies changing their policies - like Photobucket recently did. So please attach your photos to your posts as described here.

Thanks in advance!
Hanno

[MicS]

Hanno,

Thanks for adding my pics as attachments. The reason I used external photo hosting is that sometimes a forum software changes and (at least some of) the photos get lost along the way. This happened to me on Missing Lynx looong ago and on ww2talk recently .
Another is that (I think?) one has to be a member to see the attchments, and I felt that this condition might reduce the visibility of the photos and therefore the probability of someone with some relevant info to see them and join in.

But as you rightly pointed out, the Photobucket Massacre shows that this is not a perfect solution either (I did leave them long ago, so fortunately was not affected apart maybe from some very old posts which I may have forgotten about), so I would think that with both options we run less risks of losing the photos altogether.

Michel

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Michel,

Indeed I edited your posts to include both a local attachment plus a link to the photo hosting site, or the online source photo bank. Best of both worlds I think?

Anyway, I came across your name on several forums in relation to Sherman Crabs and the 1st Lothian and Border Horse Yeomanry. I am doing some research into the Shermans used in Infatuate II. I'll start a new thread and would like to ask you to chime in if you can.

Thanks,
Hanno

[MicS]

Originally Posted by Hanno Spoelstra

Indeed I edited your posts to include both a local attachment plus a link to the photo hosting site, or the online source photo bank. Best of both worlds I think?

Yes, that's what I meant by "with both options". Thanks again.

Originally Posted by Hanno Spoelstra

I am doing some research into the Shermans used in Infatuate II. I'll start a new thread and would like to ask you to chime in if you can.

Please do, I'll be happy to contribute if I can, starting with a first (and somewhat pedantic) remark: the first battalion was "1st Lothians and Border Yeomanry", no "Horse" here, which went to the 2nd battalion: "2nd Lothians and Border Horse" . But you are still correct in that the regiment was indeed "The Lothians and Border Horse Yeomanry"

Michel

[Hanno Spoelstra]

Originally Posted by MicS

Please do, I'll be happy to contribute if I can, starting with a first (and somewhat pedantic) remark: the first battalion was "1st Lothians and Border Yeomanry", no "Horse" here, which went to the 2nd battalion: "2nd Lothians and Border Horse" . But you are still correct in that the regiment was indeed "The Lothians and Border Horse Yeomanry"

Michel,

Thanks for that remark. Not pedantic, we must get the facts right.

Please see my thread Operation Infatuate II: Sherman tanks at Westkapelle. If you have anything to add and or correct, please do!

Thanks,
Hanno