![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All this talk about Centurions was me wondering if anyone has one section to spare for my little collection of track ?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I can help you out with that James, PM me
John |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I am fairly certain the thw that one I posted of in Moncton is the Mk11 that was "guarding" Lahr. regards Darrell |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree, I just conducted a Google Maps recce and the street view images do show what appears to be Mk 11 in Moncton.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
All this Centurion talk got me to take another look at my copy of Don Dingwall's The Centurion in Canadian Service (2005) and noticed this quote:
"When the 105mm gun was installed in Centurions, regardless of nationality, the loader's hatch had to be turned 180 degrees and moved to the extreme outside edge of the turret roof, as the recoil of the L7 gun would almost certainly have removed the lower legs of the loader, even though the breech assemblies of the 20 pounder and the 105mm guns were virtually identical in size." Two questions. First, how does one move a hatch on a tank turret roof? Cutting a new place for the hatch is one thing, but how do you fill in the space where the hatch once was? It's the "how do you fill in the turret escape hatch at the rear of the turret" problem all over again. Second, wouldn't the loader be sitting inside the turret assisting the gunner during the operation of the gun, rather than standing half out of the turret waiting to lose his legs? Once again, I turn to those with superior Centurion knowledge to me to answer my questions. How does one move a turret hatch and where is the loader during the operation of the 105mm gun. Thank you, gentlemen, Dan. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree Dan. The quote you give simply does not make sense. It is certainly possible to weld a plate into a hole and cut a new hole but there is very little scope for that as the turret roof of a tank is pretty well covered with stuff that has to be where it is and if the loaders hatch of a 20pdr Centurion did not cause problems, why would it with the 105 as it is only the tube and the ammo that is different.
David |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps the centre section of the turret was removed and reworked during upgrades?
Plan View - Centurion II and III.jpg Plan View Centurion.jpg 127-8 FV 4011 Centurion Turret copy.jpg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No, those are two different turrets - from new. Almost everything is different in detail. The bins on the sides are superficially similar but actually the whole turret was redisigned.
David |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Hi Ed Oh, there is a Mk 11 there in Moncton alright (for now). No need for Google for that fact. Based on photos and layout of each, I think they are the same one. regards Darrell |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CENTURION Question? | jdmcm | The Armour Forum | 4 | 10-04-17 04:11 |
And the answer to the Centurion question is.....? | Mike Cecil | The Armour Forum | 3 | 28-11-11 22:38 |
Centurion Mk 11 Question | Dan Martel | Post-war Military Vehicles | 5 | 11-09-07 01:44 |
Beldam's Canadian Centurion Gun Tanks book... | Dana Nield | For Sale Or Wanted | 0 | 05-12-03 03:41 |